Title Abstract Contents 1 2 3 4 5 Acknowlegments References Footnotes
Bench-Capon, Trevor (1995). Argument in Artificial Intelligence and Law. Legal knowledge based systems. Telecommunication and AI & Law (eds. J.C. Hage, T.J.M. Bench-Capon, M.J. Cohen and H.J. van den Herik), pp. 5-14. Koninklijke Vermande, Lelystad.
Dung, Phan Minh (1993). On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning and logic programming. IJCAI-93. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ed. Ruzena Bajcsy), pp. 852-857. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo (California).
Dung, Phan Minh (1995). On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 77, pp. 321-357.
Gordon, Thomas F. (1995). The Pleadings Game. An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Hage, Jaap C., Leenes, Ronald, and Lodder, Arno R. (1994). Hard Cases: A Procedural Approach. Artificial Intelligence and Law, Vol. 2, pp. 113-167.
Lodder, Arno R. (1996). The ideas behind DiaLaw, a procedural model for legal justification. Proceedings of the Fifth National/First European Conference on Law, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (eds. I. Carr and A. Narayanan), pp. 93-103. Exeter, England. An abstract is available on the World-Wide Web: http://www.metajur.rulimburg.nl/~arno/exeter96.htm.
Loui, R.P. (1991). Ampliative Inference, Computation, and Dialectic. Philosophy and AI. Essays at the Interface (eds. Robert Cummins and John Pollock), pp. 141-155. The MIT Press, Cambridge (Massachusetts).
Loui, R.P. (1995). The Workshop on Computational Dialectics. AI Magazine, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 101-104.
Pollock, J.L. (1994). Justification and defeat. Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 67, pp. 377-407.
Rescher, Nicholas (1977). Dialectics. A controversy-oriented approach to the theory of knowledge. State University of New York Press, Albany.
Verheij, Bart (1995a). The influence of defeated arguments in defeasible argumentation. WOCFAI 95. Proceedings of the Second World Conference on the Fundamentals of Artificial Intelligence (eds. M. De Glas and Z. Pawlak), pp. 429-440. Angkor, Paris. Also published as report SKBS/B3.A/95-03. An abstract is available on the World-Wide Web: http://www.cs.rulimburg.nl/~verheij/publications/wocfai95.htm.
Verheij, Bart (1995b). Arguments and defeat in argument-based nonmonotonic reasoning. Progress in Artificial Intelligence. 7th Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence (EPIA '95; Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 990) (eds. Carlos Pinto-Ferreira and Nuno J. Mamede), pp. 213-224. Springer, Berlin. Also published as report SKBS/B3.A/95-04. An abstract is available on the World-Wide Web: http://www.cs.rulimburg.nl/~verheij/publications/epia95.htm.
Vreeswijk, G. (1993). Studies in defeasible argumentation. Doctoral thesis, Amsterdam.
Vreeswijk, Gerard A.W. (1995). Representation of Formal Dispute with a Standing Order. MATRIKS Reports in Knowledge Engineering. MAastricht Techological Research Institute for Knowledge and Systems, Maastricht. An abstract is available on the World-Wide Web: http://www.cs.rulimburg.nl/~vreeswyk/abstracts/pps.htm.
Title Abstract Contents 1 2 3 4 5 Acknowlegments References Footnotes