 
    
    
    
      
 Next:  Interactions in Virtual 
Up:  Architectures and
  Interaction 
 Previous:  The cognitive coprocessor 
 
 
In [141], Hill and his coauthors have defined five qualities for
multimodal and multimedia interfaces:
-   Blended modalities: The user should be able to blend modes
  at any time.
-   Inclusion of ambiguity: Input modes that yield ambiguous or
  probabilistic input are desirable when appropriate.
-   Protocol of cooperation: Intervention on input and output
  modules should be available at any time.
-   Full access to the interaction history: The interpreted
  levels of interaction history must be accessible on-line as well as after
  the finishing of the interaction session.
-   Evolution: The interfaces have to be open to improvements
  without the need for a complete reimplementation.
By investigating traditional interface architectures, they found that
semantics and pragmatics are usually not shared across modalities. Another
drawback is the missing of ``felicitous interruption, information
volunteering, and intelligent displays'', which are considered to be
important interface building techniques. The different modalities of
traditional architectures are therefore ``noncommunicating components'', as
shown in figure  4.4	  .
   
Figure 4.4
: The traditional structure of modality cooperation (Taken
    from [141])
In the new structure proposed by Hill et al., some of the processing levels
have been unified across input modalities, whereas others have been
opened. Thus, ``applications [...] interact with a semantic
representation of user activities rather than a syntactic one.'' The
principle architecture according to this approach is shown in
figure  4.5	  . It is based on the  principle of uniform
  access, which guarantees for a separation of interface aspects from
the application; and the  compromise of almost homogeneous
  representation, which tries to balance between performance (mainly:
speed) achieved by specialized device drivers and access functions on the
one hand, and homogeneity that allows the blending of modalities on the
other hand.
   
Figure 4.5
: A better structure for modality blending (Taken
    from [141])
 
 
    
    
    
      
 Next:  Interactions in Virtual 
Up:  Architectures and
  Interaction 
 Previous:  The cognitive coprocessor 
 
 
 
 Esprit Project 8579/MIAMI (Schomaker et al., '95)
 Esprit Project 8579/MIAMI (Schomaker et al., '95)
 
Thu May 18 16:00:17 MET DST 1995