Modeling Crime Scenarios in a Bayesian Network

Charlotte Vlek, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij, Bart Verheij

Legal cases involve reasoning with evidence and with the development of a software support tool in mind, a formal foundation for evidential reasoning is required. Three ap- proaches to evidential reasoning have been prominent in the literature: argumentation, narrative and probabilistic rea- soning. In this paper a combination of the latter two is proposed.

In recent research on Bayesian networks applied to legal cases, a number of legal idioms have been developed as re- curring structures in legal Bayesian networks. A Bayesian network quanti es how various variables in a case interact. In the narrative approach, scenarios provide a context for the evidence in a case. A method that integrates the quan- titative, numerical techniques of Bayesian networks with the qualitative, holistic approach of scenarios is lacking.

In this paper, a method is proposed for modeling several scenarios in a single Bayesian network. The method is tested by doing a case study. Two new idioms are introduced: the scenario idiom and the merged scenarios idiom. The result- ing network is meant to assist a judge or jury, helping to maintain a good overview of the interactions between rel- evant variables in a case and preventing tunnel vision by comparing various scenarios.

Manuscript (in PDF-format)

Reference:
Vlek, C., Prakken, H., Renooij, S., & Verheij, B. (2013). Modeling Crime Scenarios in a Bayesian Network. The 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2013). Proceedings of the Conference, 150-159. New York (New York): ACM.


Bart Verheij's home page - research - publications